MAG OptiAI

MAG OptiAIOperational AIAnomaly DetectionEarly Access

Spot Unusual Patterns. Review Them in Context.

Find unusual points in your operational series and review them in context. Prepare the data, choose a detector, run scoring and inspect the flags and explanations before deciding what needs attention.

Prepare the series. Choose the detector. Review what the flagged points mean.

Prefer to explore first? Start free14-day trial · lower limits. Beta access requires approval.
Built for planning teams
Series data and unusual points
Cloud-based Pro Console
Guided evaluation

The anomaly challenge

An Unusual Point Needs More Than a Flag.

Data quality, the surrounding pattern and detector settings shape which observations deserve review.

Challenge 01 / 04

Data Issues Can Look Like Operational Issues

An unusual point deserves a look at the input as well as the outcome.

Dates, values and optional contextual inputs need to represent the series correctly. Missing or inconsistent records can change how a result should be interpreted.

Impact

Review data readiness before drawing conclusions from flagged points.

Analysts checking historical records before interpreting an unusual point.
AI-generated illustration

The challenge is more than highlighting a spike.

It is reviewing unusual points with their data, detector settings and operational context connected.

Why MAG OptiAI

A Clearer Way to Find and Review Unusual Points.

Keep the data, detector settings and scoring result connected throughout the review.

A Clear Data Foundation

Prepare or restore a named data draft with the series and applicable contextual inputs.

A Deliberate Detector Choice

Choose a supported method and inspect the settings used to identify unusual points.

Results with Review Context

Inspect flagged observations, scores, threshold and available explanation before deciding what to investigate.

Your scoring context stays connected.

Saved projects hold data drafts and scoring history. Review the data and detector settings behind the result you are investigating.

Process

How We Work

From a prepared series to unusual points you can review.

MAG OptiAI guides your team from preparing the data to choosing a detector and reviewing its scoring result.

01

Project

Choose or create your Anomaly Detection project.

A scope for data drafts and saved scoring history

Illustrative planning checkpoint
Scope
Anomaly project
History
Saved scoring runs
Selection
Choose intentionally
02

Data

Prepare and validate the data draft.

Dates and values · applicable contextual inputs · upload or samples

Illustrative planning checkpoint
Series
Dated observations
Context
Where supported
Readiness
Review input checks
03

Detector

Choose the detection method and scoring settings.

Supported detector · applicable seasonality and sensitivity settings

Illustrative planning checkpoint
Method
Supported detector
Settings
Applicable to the method
Policy
Review scoring context
04

Score

Run scoring for the prepared series.

Generate and save scores, the returned threshold and flagged indices

Illustrative planning checkpoint
Run
Score the prepared data
Outcome
Scores and flags
History
Persisted scoring result
05

Results

Review the unusual points and their context.

Series chart · flagged points · scores · exports · grounded explanation

Illustrative planning checkpoint
Review
Flags and surrounding data
History
Open a saved run
Use
Investigate and export

Core capabilities

What Anomaly Can Do for Your Organization

A connected workflow for preparing series data, configuring detection and inspecting unusual points.

Prepare Operational Series

Upload or use samples, inspect readiness and restore saved data drafts.

Include Applicable Context

Use single-series or multivariate inputs where supported by the detector.

Choose a Detection Method

Select from Z-score, seasonal/contextual methods, Isolation Forest, LOF and One-Class SVM.

Represent Seasonal Patterns

Use the applicable seasonal and contextual settings of the chosen method.

Review Sensitivity Settings

Configure the settings supported by the detector and inspect the returned threshold.

Keep Saved Scoring History

Open a saved scoring run intentionally as the reference result.

Inspect and Export Outputs

Review series charts, flagged observations and scores, then export results.

Use Grounded AI Explanation

Ask for interpretation tied to the successful anomaly result and its context.

All in one place.

The tools to prepare, score and review in one connected workflow.

Anomaly Detection in action

See the Observations Behind the Flags.

Review the unusual points alongside the surrounding series. This illustration explains the concept; it is not a measured detector result.

A flag deserves context before a conclusion.

Inspect the point's value, score, returned threshold and surrounding observations. Expected values can provide additional context where the detector returns them.

Use flags to focus investigation. An unusual value does not by itself establish a fault or root cause.

Series and points for reviewIllustrative
Point 4Point 8Observations over time
Observed seriesIllustrative flags
ObservationValueReview
Point 4130Flagged for review
Point 838Flagged for review
Fictitious values and flags. Illustrative concept, not a detector result, proven fault or measured detection-performance claim.

Who it’s for

Is Anomaly Detection a Good Fit for Your Team?

For teams reviewing unusual observations in a defined operational series.

Operations Review Teams

Prepare a relevant series and investigate changes, spikes or drops against its operational context.

Analysts Choosing Detectors

Select supported methods and evaluate applicable seasonal, contextual and sensitivity settings.

Teams Investigating Flags

Inspect scoring outputs and surrounding observations before deciding what needs attention.

Every series and review question is different. Evaluate whether the selected detector and inputs provide useful signals for your investigation.

The Anomaly Detection Evaluation

Real Problem. Real Evaluation. Real Impact.

Bring your anomaly review question and evaluate the fit with your organization’s information.

What You Get

Access for a Larger Evaluation

Apply through the existing beta process to evaluate beyond the smaller free-trial limits.

A Guided Data Setup

Frame the operational question and prepare a series with the applicable context.

A Detector-Based Workflow

Choose supported methods and inspect the settings used for scoring.

A Direct Feedback Channel

Discuss setup difficulties, unclear flags and requirements that need a better fit.

Results You Can Review

Inspect flagged observations and available interpretation to judge usefulness for investigation.

What We Ask From You

A Defined Review Question

Bring the operational series and the unusual patterns your team wants to investigate.

Usable Historical Data

Provide dates, values and applicable contextual inputs. Anonymized data should retain the patterns and required relationships.

Practical Feedback

Tell us where preparation, detector configuration or interpretation needs improvement.

A Review of the Outcome

Investigate the flagged points in your operational context before drawing a conclusion.

Real Problem

Real Evaluation

Better planning decisions.

A real-world evaluation with your organization.

Bring your anomaly detection problem and real or anonymized historical data. We will review the fit and help you get started.

Anomaly Beta

Frequently Asked Questions

What to know before evaluating your anomaly requirements.

What data do I need?

Start with a dated series and a clear review question. Prepare the values and contextual inputs required by your chosen method, then review the product's requirements and readiness checks.

Which detectors are available?

The current workspace supports Z-score, STL Z-score, contextual Z-score, Isolation Forest, Local Outlier Factor and One-Class SVM. Input and setting requirements depend on the method.

Do I train and stage saved model versions here?

This product's workflow is Data, Detector and Score. Choose the detector and scoring settings, run scoring and review saved results. It does not use Forecasting's model-training and staging workflow.

Can I use seasonal or contextual information?

Yes, where supported by the selected detector and dataset. Applicable settings and input requirements differ between methods.

Does every detector's score mean the same thing?

No. Review the method, returned threshold and flagged points together. Scores should not automatically be interpreted as probabilities or compared as if they share one scale.

Does a flag prove an operational fault?

No. A flag identifies a point for review under the selected method. Check the surrounding observations and operational context before deciding whether there is an issue.

How does Early Access relate to the trial and beta?

Early Access describes product maturity. Start Free uses the existing 14-day trial with lower limits. Larger evaluations use the existing beta application and team approval; there is no separate access-request system.

What can AI explanation help with?

Explanation can interpret the successful scoring result and available context. It does not prove root cause, establish causality or replace an operational investigation.

How do I apply for a larger evaluation?

Use Apply for the Anomaly Detection Beta to reach the existing product-specific application. Our team reviews your requirements and confirms the fit for an evaluation.

Still have a question?

Talk to us about your anomaly evaluation.

Contact our teamsupport@magoptiai.com

Ready to get started?

Ready to Evaluate Anomaly with Your Organization’s Data?

Tell us about your operational series and anomaly review requirements. We will review your application and confirm whether the current Anomaly Detection Beta is a good fit for your organization.

No payment requiredApplication reviewed by our team